Thursday, March 31, 2011

Spreading Fat Stigma Around the Globe

The New York Times recently published an article chronicling the reactions that people around the world have to obesity. In America, there has been a stigma on being overweight for some time. Just turn on Disney channel and you’ll see all thin stars with overweight goofball friends. Overweight people are always construed as a joke in American media which perpetuates an ongoing discrimination of obese individuals. But now the stigma is going further than just the United States. With the incorporation of American media into countries around the globe, the same perceptions of beauty that are held in the United States, those of being skinny and tanned, are common in other countries.

These outrageous perceptions of beauty have created a stigma on being overweight that is completely over the top. Nisha Somaia, an Indian plus-size designer, said, “I had a highly educated friend confess that she would prefer for her children to be anorexic rather than overweight.” Sergio Miranda, an owner of a shoeshine stand in Mexico City, when questioned about his feelings towards overweight people said, "The fatties take up a lot of space. People are annoyed. It’s uncomfortable.”

Statements like Mr. Miranda’s and Mrs. Somaia’s are not anomalies in their societies. These quotes are just two of many cycling around the globe that reflect a negative attitude toward overweight individuals. Rhetoric used in this way is a prime example of words being used for evil purposes that make others feel small.

Thursday, March 24, 2011

.com , .org , .xxx?

You all know about different internet domains. The typical .com that comes after most websites, the .edu that comes after all of Penn States sites, the .org that comes at the end of nonprofit sites (like pbs.kids.org!) and .gov for all those super government websites everyone hangs out on. What would you think if a new domain came out, one that was solely dedicated to porn?

On March 18, Icann (the organization that gives out domains for all internet sites) approved a new domain solely for pornographic websites. Arguments are coming out against the idea from religious groups and pornographers alike. Religious groups believe that giving pornographic sites their own domain legitimizes the use of websites such as those. Pornographers believe that the adding of the specific domain will make pornographic websites seem more "ghetto" and therefore bring down the usage.

It seems almost sad that we have come to the necessity of having a new domain dedicated to pornographic sites. Isn't it enough that these sites can be stumbled upon by anyone on Google? Is it really necessary for a whole new domain to come out?

What do you think?

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Tweet Tweet

I've got to admit, I am not riding the Twitter bandwagon, the first time I went on the website was just five minutes ago. Yet even though I don’t use the website, it still follows me around on a daily basis. When Twitter became a viable news source is completely beyond me, but if I want to watch my favorite show (SportsCenter on ESPN) or just television news, Twitter is always there.

On more than one occasion I have been sitting watching my beloved SportsCenter and seen “LeBron James Tweet” in the queue of stories still to come. Personally, I am not a LeBron James fan so I couldn’t care less about what he has to say, but even without my bias towards the player, why should anyone watching SportsCenter care what he has to say. What can be said in a cap of 145 words that can actually make a difference?

Not only that, but more often than not, LeBron (and other athletes and celebrities with millions of people “Following” them) will say scathing things that attack other players, teams or coaches. A paragraph of text can cause a scandal that will last weeks in the media and it was all put out there by a single click of a button. Tweet, tweet, tweet you just lost thousands of fans.

Twitter is a slightly creepy new form of social networking that allows people to know exactly what others are doing right now. In a limited amount of text, celebrities and commoners alike tell of their whereabouts or opinions on anything and everything. Apparently, American media is content with a single block of text and believes that it is news worthy, but I don’t.
What do you think about Twitter?

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Crisis in Dairyland

Here's the earlier clip!

Apples Don't Grow On Trees


Earlier in this episode of the Daily Show, Jon Stewart plays a news clip in which a analyst claimed that teachers should be paid minimum wage because they have such an "easy job" where they get out of work at 3 everyday and don't have to work summers. All of this, in case you are unaware, is due to the controversy regarding the teachers' union in Wisconsin.

I'm having a really difficult time trying to form an opinion on this issue. I don't agree in the slightest that teachers don't have a difficult job. I honestly believe that teachers do the most important job on Earth, let's be real where would we be without an education? However, one of the hot-button issues of this controversy is the idea of all teachers being paid the same amount and seniority being the main reason that teachers keep their jobs.

I bet everyone has horror stories about teachers they had in elementary, middle and high school. I know for sure that I do. Take for instance my fifth grade teacher, Mr. Schultz. This man was evil. Not only did he make me cry multiple times during school by calling me dumb, but he also made me cry at my parent-teacher conference. Yeah, right in front of my parents my teacher says how dumb and lazy I am. That man definitely does not deserve to get the same salary as my fourth grade math teacher, Mrs. Allen who connected with everyone on a personal level and was incredibly helpful. You could tell she genuinely loved her job, whereas Mr. Schultz acted like he hated children. Teachers should get pay raises based on merit as opposed to seniority.

But what do you think?